Re: Wanna know why is fast lens so expensive?

by **Hanne** Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:23 pm

bennylok wrote:Put some poison

Sigma 12-24mm @ 12mm ; F5

Well, for outdoor. This lens is good; but indoor abit lose cause at max only F4.5 which is not enough especially low light environment. But since this lens built for Full Frame; well can say boost high ISO...but the image quality not tat nice loh.

Much prefer at least F4 for all rounder ($$$ VS lens capability).

No filter can b use...so have to extra careful when handling it especially crowded area. Built quality wise...as Sigma brand...ya getting closer to OEM brand lens rather old Sigma design which not so solid.

So far..quite happy about it but if budget allow; better get F2.8. Haha. (tat 1 stupid also know lah...rite?)

wah benny diam diam buy sigman 12-24 hehe ...

by changshong Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:31 pm

jump jump jump

by Guest Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:38 pm

good
i found u changshong
u jump i jump
u jump to my sony (buy all my gears) then i jump to your canon buy all your gears

by derricklim Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:58 pm

barrel quite obvious... but really poisoning... hahaha

by changshong Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:15 pm

georgewong wrote:good
i found u changshong
u jump i jump
u jump to my sony (buy all my gears) then i jump to your canon buy all your gears

ha ha no la... i don't have the money.. but ler.. to me always can take good photo than is a good camera.. what brand no difference...

by **Hanne** Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:21 pm

yaya changshong u are rite mannnnnnnnnn

by CY Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:06 pm

changshong wrote:
ha ha no la... i don't have the money.. but ler.. to me always can take good photo than is a good camera.. what brand no difference...

Agreed

by **simmon** Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:22 pm

Benny, how much it cost?

by **Hanne** Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:48 pm

grey set 2800++ local set 3200++

by bennylok Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:44 pm

Hanne wrote:grey set 2800++ local set 3200++

get 1 lah....Han; I know u can 1. Haha...u also pandai diam diam. Laughing

by CY Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:51 pm

bennylok wrote:
get 1 lah....Han; I know u can 1. Haha...u also pandai diam diam.

Hann recently got new toys leh Razz

, not yet debut pictures on it yet.

by **Hanne** Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:19 pm

bennylok wrote:
Hanne wrote:grey set 2800++ local set 3200++

get 1 lah....Han; I know u can 1. Haha...u also pandai diam diam.

haha sama sama la benny

CY wrote:
bennylok wrote:
get 1 lah....Han; I know u can 1. Haha...u also pandai diam diam.

Hann recently got new toys leh , not yet debut pictures on it yet.

shuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

by bennylok Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:51 pm

CY wrote:
bennylok wrote:
get 1 lah....Han; I know u can 1. Haha...u also pandai diam diam.

Hann recently got new toys leh , not yet debut pictures on it yet.

Expected...now wait him to upload some poisonous pic. Haha

by TK Tan Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:02 am

derricklim wrote:

and also i heard from a friend of mine, he said zooming power more than 5x is going to decrease the optical quality. so he never used 18-200mm or 55-250mm (for example).

It should be 3x instead of 5x

A common saying is any zoom lens that exceeds 3x is consider not sharp already

by Sponsored content